He has just exposed our plan to post in Wikipedia to the very editor that Dennis labeled as "disturbed":
How do I know that Bookish is the same guy, 81.174.214, who exposed our plan?Our squeal wrote:Highly suspicious talk page entries
In less than half a day 4 new comments have been added to the Talk:Child_sacrifice_in_pre-Columbian_cultures page. Two from newly registered users, one from a user who has never contributed to an article, and one from an anonymous user. I think it was contrived. See this forum page:
http://primalforum.freepgs.com/forum/vi ... .php?t=161
220.127.116.11 16:13, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
Simple. His I.P. number is the same one that used to appear in my private forum, where besides "Bookish" he also used to post under the name of "bb".
I don't know what will happen in Wikipedia after our little plan to correct the anti-child bias has been exposed.
Dennis: I am sorry to open up this thread here and not in my private forum. But every poster who supported me in the Aztec sacrifice talk page has been betrayed, not only us. Bookish had already shown some strange behavior in both my private forum and his own private forum. I have saved it and can show it to whoever asks me.
I cannot ascertain a 100 per cent if the other two sockpuppets that post in this forum are also Bookish, since I don't have access code to Dennis' admin page. But I would like that an investigation takes place. I have told Dennis who are the other two names of which I suspect Bookish has been posting here.